- #MACBOOK PRO 13 INCH MID 2012 CORE I7 2.9GHZ MOVIE#
- #MACBOOK PRO 13 INCH MID 2012 CORE I7 2.9GHZ ARCHIVE#
Using Steam and Steam for Mac, we created a self-running demo for Portal and recorded the frames-per-second rating.-Macworld Lab testing by James Galbraith, William Wang, Kean Bartelman, and Mauricio Grijalva. In Cinebench, we ran that application’s OpenGL frames-per-second test. We ran Mathematica 8’s Evaluate Notebook Test. In Aperture 3 we performed an Import and Process on 207 photos.
In Photoshop CS5, we ran an action script on a 100MB image file. We installed Parallels 6 and ran WorldBench 6’s Multitask test. In Cinebench, we recorded how long it took to render a scene with multiprocessors. In Handbrake 0.9.5, we encoded a single chapter (to H.264 using the application’s Normal settings) from a DVD that was previously ripped to the hard drive. In iTunes, we converted 135 minutes of AAC audio files to MP3 using the High Quality setting.
#MACBOOK PRO 13 INCH MID 2012 CORE I7 2.9GHZ MOVIE#
In iMovie ’11, we imported a two-minute clip from a camera archive, and performed a Share Movie to iTunes for Mobile Devices function. In Pages ’09 we converted and opened a 500-page Microsoft Word document.
#MACBOOK PRO 13 INCH MID 2012 CORE I7 2.9GHZ ARCHIVE#
How We Tested: We duplicated a 2GB file, created a Zip archive in the Finder from the two 2GB files and then unzipped it. Both new laptops have a 33 percent higher frame rate in Portal 2.ġ3-inch MacBook Pro 2012 Model Benchmarksġ3-inch MacBook Pro/2.5GHz Core i5 (Mid 2012)ġ3-inch MacBook Pro/2.9GHz Core i7 (Mid 2012)ġ3-inch MacBook Pro/2.4GHz Core i5 (Late 2011)ġ3-inch MacBook Pro/2.8GHz Core i7 (Late 2011)Īll times in seconds (lower is better), except for Cinebench OpenGL and Portal, which are frames per second (higher is better), and Mathematica and Speedmark, which are scores (higher is better). The greatest improvement is in graphics performance, with the new high- and low-end 13-inch MacBook Pros (with the Intel HD Graphics 4000) displaying 42 percent and 52 percent more frames per second, respectively, in Cinebench’s OpenGL test, over the older laptops with the Intel HD Graphics 3000. Their predecessors shipped with dual core Sandy Bridge processors, Intel HD Graphics 3000, and 1333 MHz DDR3 SDRAM a 2.4GHz Core i5 with 4GB RAM, and a 500GB hard drive were in the low-end model, and a 2.8GHz Core i7, 4GB RAM and a 750GB hard drive were in the high-end model.Ĭomparing the new low-end 13-inch MacBook Pro to its predecessor, we found the new system to be 9 percent faster overall, while the new high-end 13-inch MacBook Pro is 15 percent faster overall than its predecessor. The new 13-inch MacBook Pro now ships either a 2.5GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 (Ivy Bridge) processor, 4GB of memory, Intel HD Graphics 4000, and a 500GB hard drive for $1199, or with a 2.9GHz dual-core Core i7 processor, 8GB of memory, Intel HD Graphics 4000, and a 750GB hard drive for $1499. To see the differences in performance, the Macworld Lab turned once again to its all-around system performance benchmarking suite, Speedmark 7. Macworld Lab’s results for these new systems are in. And while much of the surrounding hoopla focused on the new Retina MacBook Pro ( ), the more familiar-looking 13 and 15-inch models also received some welcomed upgrades. Apple recently overhauled its entire line of laptops, including its 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pros.
0 kommentar(er)
